Was a good team a few years ago, not so much now - Software Engineer T3 CACI International Employee Review

3.0
Dec 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Remote role with no micromanagement. - Working in an interesting, niche space with unique problems. - Working on a small dev team results in strong influence in high-level decisions and codebase ownership. - You'll be wearing many hats and working across the entire stack since this is a small team, which results in a quicker path to seniority. This can also be a very bad thing depending on who you are. - Good work/life balance. - Friendly teammates. - Decent benefits (401k match, health/dental/vision, etc.)

Cons

- Customer service/sales team slowly became non-existent over the years (they all eventually resigned) and management didn't hire anyone to replace them, which led to a drop in revenue, which ultimately led to layoffs across the organization. - Layoffs year after year in the engineering team means more work spread across less people. New engineers have not been hired and will likely be the cause of collapse for this team, or result in burnout for the remaining handful of engineers at the very least. - Accomplishments consistently receive an “attaboy” instead of meaningful compensation or any tangible recognition. - Compensation is lacking and is below market rate for software engineers. Don't expect any bonuses, large raises, or promotions. You'll likely only receive the 3% "cost of living adjustment" each year in lieu of a proper raise/promotion. For future candidates: negotiate as high as possible before accepting an offer. - There is a very severe lack of diversity within my branch of CACI. - Will also list wearing many hats/working across the entire stack here.

Explore other reviews about CACI International

5.0
Mar 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great working as an intern at CACI

Cons

Not too many cons to report

1.0
Mar 24, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Unfortunately, the negative aspects of the organizational culture and leadership practices significantly outweighed any positive elements of the experience.

Cons

I rarely write reviews, but I believe transparency helps others make informed decisions. In my experience, leadership focused more on maintaining control and protecting image than on addressing real operational or cultural issues. When employees set professional boundaries or raise legitimate concerns, the response was often to manage the narrative rather than resolve the problem. Problems were frequently ignored or redirected toward the individual who had the courage to speak up. At times, this created an environment that felt retaliatory rather than constructive. Commitments made by leadership were not consistently followed through, which gradually eroded trust and morale. While communication often sounded positive on the surface, actions did not always align with stated values. Over time, this pattern of decision-making appeared to extend beyond internal culture and into business outcomes. A lack of integrity and accountability at the management level contributed to strained client relationships and, in certain cases, the loss of key contracts. These situations did not only impact employees. They also affected the company’s external credibility and long-term reputation in the market. An organization’s integrity is ultimately reflected in how it handles uncomfortable truths. Here, accountability appeared secondary to optics, and ethical consistency was not always evident. Professionals who value transparency, principled leadership, and psychological safety may find this environment challenging.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All