Still a great place to work - Manager SAS Employee Review

5.0
Apr 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Despite all of the organizational changes, SAS remains a great place to work, where employees are respected and prioritized. The work life balance is far superior in comparison to other orgs. If you really evaluate the platform, the “math and statistics” remain superior in comparison to other vendors, even though it might not be evident in the market.

Cons

Lots of organizational changes as of recent, which has caused employees some concern. In addition, the strategy has shifted to industry first- solving real business problems versus a traditional technical sell. This is the right move but should have happened years ago, considering all of the phenomenal success stories of clients using the software, which could be leveraged in the pre-sales process. All the hype with open source is hurting the business, but one really needs to get back to the math.

Explore other reviews about SAS

5.0
Apr 9, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work culture and supportive managers

Cons

At times the tasks felt repetitive

3.0
Dec 11, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

SAS offers remarkable stability thanks to its 50 years old history and private ownership. The company does not follow the aggressive efficiency trends of many competitors, which translates into a manageable workload and a relatively stress-free environment. Work-life balance is excellent, making it an ideal choice for those who value a predictable “9-to-5” schedule. Benefits are decent, and the overall atmosphere is calm and secure: perfect for professionals seeking job security rather than rapid career progression.

Cons

On the downside, the culture feels outdated and resistant to change. The organization operates more like a public institution than a modern tech company, with slow processes and limited mobility. Many employees have been in the same role for decades, and advancement opportunities are scarce. Internal processes are complex and often inefficient, while proprietary products tend to be overly complicated, reflecting an old-school approach to technology. Knowledge is concentrated among a few “gurus,” creating a hierarchical and closed environment. Compensation is average, and training resources are not particularly effective.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All