Corporate - Oakland - Anonymous employee Matson Employee Review

4.0
Jul 7, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Industry leader that continues to grow (slowly) and change (slowly) with the changing global economy - Financially sound - Solid pay, great benefits, good work/life balance and a pleasant working environment - Career opportunities for growth, but don't expect that they'll be handed to you - No hipsters/pretentious individuals, just good, nice people that work hard - Oakland Corp office is very commutable - Overall great place, especially for those that are mid-career (family) focused

Cons

- If you're looking for hyper growth or disruption, this is not the place - this industry is slow and capital intensive - Low turnover, so career opportunities may appear limited, especially if being compared to tech - No ping pong tables, kegs, all you can eat junk food, etc. - I think this is a Pro! - Not a sexy company or industry (if that's what you're looking for in your career)

Explore other reviews about Matson

5.0
Aug 14, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good hours and friendly coworkers

Cons

There was alot of workload

1.0
Mar 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission is real and the work matters. There are strong, capable people who keep the business running even when the system makes it harder than it needs to be. You’ll learn fast in a complex, high-pressure environment.

Cons

> There’s a leadership talent drain. Some of the best leaders either left or were pushed out, and the difference is obvious in how decisions get made and how work gets executed. >Ownership and credit can be political. Execution teams build the capability, but recognition often flows elsewhere. >Recognition is upside down: business teams get celebrated for planning and announcements, while IT needs an act of God to get noticed — even when it’s doing heroics to keep the business alive. When things work, IT is invisible; when things break, IT is expected to perform miracles. > Priorities shift late and often, with weak decision trails. Work gets restarted, redirected, or rebranded after months of progress because the narrative changes or the “right” stakeholders weren’t in the room at the right time. >The finish line moves constantly. Teams get close to delivery, then scope expands and timelines reset. It’s churn disguised as alignment. >Concerns raised early get brushed off; later, the same leaders demand emergency heroics when the risk becomes visible.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All